refactor: split the questionnaire into teamer and bus feedback
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
2f4f9800dd
commit
a0170f5952
35 files changed
+1114
-554
No files matched your search
+11
-135
@@ -1,144 +1,28 @@
|
||||
# Questionnaire a teamer fills in after a placement (Disposition, not SeasonAssignment).
|
||||
# Questionnaire a teamer fills in after a placement with bus escort, in addition to
|
||||
# teamer_feedback.yaml and on the same page (App\Service\Questionnaire\DispositionContext).
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Replaces the Google forms "RL-Feedback 25-26" and "Bus-Feedback 25-26"; the question-by-question
|
||||
# spec, with every decision taken, is in .ddev/plans/questionnaires/. Every teamer gets the
|
||||
# sections up to "Sonstiges"; the sections marked `only_for: bus_escort` are added when the
|
||||
# assignment had a bus escort. Questions whose answer the disposition already knows (name, job
|
||||
# profile, house, dates, destination, escort pickup) are not asked: they are snapshotted into the
|
||||
# response's context instead.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Parsed and validated by App\Config\QuestionnaireCatalog; QuestionnaireCatalogTest builds it.
|
||||
# Replaces the Google form "Bus-Feedback 25-26"; the question-by-question spec, with every decision
|
||||
# taken, is in .ddev/plans/questionnaires/bus-feedback-25-26.yaml. Questions whose answer the
|
||||
# disposition already knows (travel date, destination, Reiseleitung, first pickup) are not asked:
|
||||
# they are snapshotted into the response's context instead.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Labels, help texts, section titles and option labels may be edited in place. Renaming or
|
||||
# removing a question or option key, or changing a type, needs a new version: copy this file to
|
||||
# teamer_assignment.v1.yaml first, then bump `version` here. Submitted answers are keyed by it.
|
||||
# bus_feedback.v1.yaml first, then bump `version` here. Submitted answers are keyed by it.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Parsed and validated by App\Config\QuestionnaireCatalog; QuestionnaireCatalogTest builds it.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Section fields: key, title, only_for (a App\Enum\QuestionnaireFlag value), questions.
|
||||
# Question fields: key, label, type (text | textarea | choice | multi | date | rating),
|
||||
# required (default false), help, widget (choice only: radio | dropdown, default radio),
|
||||
# options (choice and multi only), show_if ({question, equals | in | lte}, earlier questions only).
|
||||
|
||||
key: teamer_assignment
|
||||
key: bus_feedback
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
title: "Reiseleiter/-in Feedback"
|
||||
description: |-
|
||||
Nur durch euer Feedback können wir besser werden! 🙂
|
||||
|
||||
Bei Bewertunsskalen: 1= schlecht, 5 = sehr gut
|
||||
title: "Bus-Feedback"
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- key: organisation
|
||||
title: "Organisation & Ablauf"
|
||||
questions:
|
||||
- key: office_briefing_rating
|
||||
label: "Wie gut hast du dich vorab vom Büro gebrieft gefühlt?"
|
||||
type: rating
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
|
||||
- key: office_briefing_low_reason
|
||||
label: "Wenn 1 - 3 Sterne Bewertung, warum?"
|
||||
type: textarea
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
show_if: { question: office_briefing_rating, lte: 3 }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: team_week_seminar
|
||||
label: "War das Wochenteam-Seminar hilfreich für dich? Warst du bzw. wurdest du gut vorbereitet?"
|
||||
type: choice
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- { key: very_helpful, label: "Ja, die Schulung war sehr hilfreich und ich fühlte mich bestens vorbereitet." }
|
||||
- { key: mostly_helpful, label: "Ja, größtenteils – einige Themen hätte man noch vertiefen können." }
|
||||
- { key: partly_helpful, label: "Es ging – die Schulung war teilweise hilfreich, aber nicht ausreichend für alle Aufgaben." }
|
||||
- { key: rather_not_helpful, label: "Eher nein – ich fühlte mich in vielen Bereichen unvorbereitet." }
|
||||
- { key: not_helpful, label: "Nein, die Schulung war kaum hilfreich und hat mich nicht auf den Arbeitsalltag vorbereitet." }
|
||||
- { key: not_attended, label: "Ich habe nicht teilgenommen." }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: onsite_organisation_rating
|
||||
label: "Wie gut lief die Reiseorganisation vor Ort?"
|
||||
type: rating
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
|
||||
- key: had_organisational_problems
|
||||
label: "Gab es organisatorische Probleme?"
|
||||
type: choice
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- { key: "yes", label: "Ja" }
|
||||
- { key: "no", label: "Nein" }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: organisational_problems
|
||||
label: "Wenn ja, welche?"
|
||||
type: text
|
||||
show_if: { question: had_organisational_problems, equals: "yes" }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: communication
|
||||
title: "Kommunikation & Zusammenarbeit"
|
||||
questions:
|
||||
- key: teamer_collaboration_rating
|
||||
label: "Wie lief die Kommunikation & Zusammenarbeit mit den E&P Teamer:innen vor Ort während der Reise?"
|
||||
type: rating
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
|
||||
- key: support_wished
|
||||
label: "Welche Unterstützung hättest du dir zusätzlich gewünscht?"
|
||||
type: textarea
|
||||
|
||||
- key: house_manager_problem_handling
|
||||
label: "Wie ist deine Hausleitung mit Problemen vor Ort umgegangen?"
|
||||
type: choice
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- { key: very_good, label: "Sehr gut – Probleme wurden schnell, fair und lösungsorientiert behandelt." }
|
||||
- { key: good, label: "Gut – die meisten Anliegen wurden ernst genommen und bearbeitet." }
|
||||
- { key: mixed, label: "Teils gut/teils schlecht – manche Probleme wurden gelöst, andere nicht." }
|
||||
- { key: rather_poor, label: "Eher schlecht – es wurde wenig unternommen oder nicht auf Augenhöhe kommuniziert." }
|
||||
- { key: very_poor, label: "Sehr schlecht – Probleme wurden ignoriert oder verschlimmert." }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: felt_overwhelmed
|
||||
label: "Gab es Momente, in denen du dich überfordert gefühlt hast?"
|
||||
type: choice
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- { key: "yes", label: "Ja" }
|
||||
- { key: "no", label: "Nein" }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: overwhelmed_reason
|
||||
label: "Wenn ja, wodurch?"
|
||||
type: textarea
|
||||
show_if: { question: felt_overwhelmed, equals: "yes" }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: improvement
|
||||
title: "Verbesserung"
|
||||
questions:
|
||||
- key: wished_differently
|
||||
label: "Was hättest du dir anders oder besser gewünscht?"
|
||||
type: textarea
|
||||
|
||||
- key: would_work_again
|
||||
label: "Würdest du wieder als Reiseleitung für E&P arbeiten?"
|
||||
type: choice
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- { key: "yes", label: "Ja" }
|
||||
- { key: "no", label: "Nein" }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: would_not_work_again_reason
|
||||
label: "Wenn nein, warum nicht?"
|
||||
type: textarea
|
||||
show_if: { question: would_work_again, equals: "no" }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: other
|
||||
title: "Sonstiges"
|
||||
questions:
|
||||
- key: anything_else
|
||||
label: |-
|
||||
Du hast nun schon vieles beantwortet,
|
||||
aber nirgendwo konntest du folgende Aspekte loswerden:
|
||||
type: textarea
|
||||
|
||||
- key: bus_trip
|
||||
title: "Busfahrt"
|
||||
only_for: bus_escort
|
||||
questions:
|
||||
- key: direction
|
||||
label: "Hin- oder Rückfahrt"
|
||||
@@ -167,7 +51,6 @@ sections:
|
||||
|
||||
- key: bus_team
|
||||
title: "Busteam"
|
||||
only_for: bus_escort
|
||||
questions:
|
||||
- key: driver_names
|
||||
label: "Busfahrer-Namen:"
|
||||
@@ -176,7 +59,6 @@ sections:
|
||||
|
||||
- key: bus_first_pickup
|
||||
title: "1. Abfahrtsort"
|
||||
only_for: bus_escort
|
||||
questions:
|
||||
- key: on_time_at_first_pickup
|
||||
label: "Bus pünktlich am 1. Abfahrtsort?"
|
||||
@@ -194,7 +76,6 @@ sections:
|
||||
|
||||
- key: bus_rating
|
||||
title: "Bewertung Bus & Fahrer"
|
||||
only_for: bus_escort
|
||||
questions:
|
||||
- key: overall_impression
|
||||
label: "Gesamteindruck des Busses"
|
||||
@@ -275,7 +156,6 @@ sections:
|
||||
|
||||
- key: bus_pickups
|
||||
title: "Ladestellen"
|
||||
only_for: bus_escort
|
||||
questions:
|
||||
- key: drivers_knew_pickups
|
||||
label: "Waren den Fahrern alle Abfahrtsorte bekannt?"
|
||||
@@ -293,7 +173,6 @@ sections:
|
||||
|
||||
- key: bus_destination
|
||||
title: "Zielkenntnis"
|
||||
only_for: bus_escort
|
||||
questions:
|
||||
- key: drivers_knew_destination
|
||||
label: "War den Busfahrern der Zielort und die Ausladestelle bekannt?"
|
||||
@@ -305,7 +184,6 @@ sections:
|
||||
|
||||
- key: bus_equipment
|
||||
title: "Bus, Technik & Allgemeines"
|
||||
only_for: bus_escort
|
||||
questions:
|
||||
- key: video
|
||||
label: "Video/DVD-Gerät"
|
||||
@@ -355,7 +233,6 @@ sections:
|
||||
|
||||
- key: bus_damage
|
||||
title: "Schäden"
|
||||
only_for: bus_escort
|
||||
questions:
|
||||
- key: bus_damage
|
||||
label: "Entstanden während der Fahrt Schäden am Bus?"
|
||||
@@ -374,7 +251,6 @@ sections:
|
||||
|
||||
- key: bus_remarks
|
||||
title: "Anmerkungen zur Busfahrt"
|
||||
only_for: bus_escort
|
||||
questions:
|
||||
- key: bus_remarks
|
||||
label: "Das ging gar nicht / ist besonders hervorzuheben:"
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
|
||||
# Questionnaire every teamer fills in after a placement (Disposition, not SeasonAssignment).
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Replaces the Google form "RL-Feedback 25-26"; the question-by-question spec, with every decision
|
||||
# taken, is in .ddev/plans/questionnaires/rl-feedback-25-26.yaml. A teamer who escorted the bus
|
||||
# also gets bus_feedback.yaml, on the same page. Questions whose answer the disposition already
|
||||
# knows (name, job profile, house, arrival day) are not asked: they are snapshotted into the
|
||||
# response's context instead.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Labels, help texts, section titles and option labels may be edited in place. Renaming or
|
||||
# removing a question or option key, or changing a type, needs a new version: copy this file to
|
||||
# teamer_feedback.v1.yaml first, then bump `version` here. Submitted answers are keyed by it.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Parsed and validated by App\Config\QuestionnaireCatalog; QuestionnaireCatalogTest builds it.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Question fields: key, label, type (text | textarea | choice | multi | date | rating),
|
||||
# required (default false), help, widget (choice only: radio | dropdown, default radio),
|
||||
# options (choice and multi only), show_if ({question, equals | in | lte}, earlier questions only).
|
||||
|
||||
key: teamer_feedback
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
title: "Reiseleiter/-in Feedback"
|
||||
description: |-
|
||||
Nur durch euer Feedback können wir besser werden! 🙂
|
||||
|
||||
Bei Bewertunsskalen: 1= schlecht, 5 = sehr gut
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- key: organisation
|
||||
title: "Organisation & Ablauf"
|
||||
questions:
|
||||
- key: office_briefing_rating
|
||||
label: "Wie gut hast du dich vorab vom Büro gebrieft gefühlt?"
|
||||
type: rating
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
|
||||
- key: office_briefing_low_reason
|
||||
label: "Wenn 1 - 3 Sterne Bewertung, warum?"
|
||||
type: textarea
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
show_if: { question: office_briefing_rating, lte: 3 }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: team_week_seminar
|
||||
label: "War das Wochenteam-Seminar hilfreich für dich? Warst du bzw. wurdest du gut vorbereitet?"
|
||||
type: choice
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- { key: very_helpful, label: "Ja, die Schulung war sehr hilfreich und ich fühlte mich bestens vorbereitet." }
|
||||
- { key: mostly_helpful, label: "Ja, größtenteils – einige Themen hätte man noch vertiefen können." }
|
||||
- { key: partly_helpful, label: "Es ging – die Schulung war teilweise hilfreich, aber nicht ausreichend für alle Aufgaben." }
|
||||
- { key: rather_not_helpful, label: "Eher nein – ich fühlte mich in vielen Bereichen unvorbereitet." }
|
||||
- { key: not_helpful, label: "Nein, die Schulung war kaum hilfreich und hat mich nicht auf den Arbeitsalltag vorbereitet." }
|
||||
- { key: not_attended, label: "Ich habe nicht teilgenommen." }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: onsite_organisation_rating
|
||||
label: "Wie gut lief die Reiseorganisation vor Ort?"
|
||||
type: rating
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
|
||||
- key: had_organisational_problems
|
||||
label: "Gab es organisatorische Probleme?"
|
||||
type: choice
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- { key: "yes", label: "Ja" }
|
||||
- { key: "no", label: "Nein" }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: organisational_problems
|
||||
label: "Wenn ja, welche?"
|
||||
type: text
|
||||
show_if: { question: had_organisational_problems, equals: "yes" }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: communication
|
||||
title: "Kommunikation & Zusammenarbeit"
|
||||
questions:
|
||||
- key: teamer_collaboration_rating
|
||||
label: "Wie lief die Kommunikation & Zusammenarbeit mit den E&P Teamer:innen vor Ort während der Reise?"
|
||||
type: rating
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
|
||||
- key: support_wished
|
||||
label: "Welche Unterstützung hättest du dir zusätzlich gewünscht?"
|
||||
type: textarea
|
||||
|
||||
- key: house_manager_problem_handling
|
||||
label: "Wie ist deine Hausleitung mit Problemen vor Ort umgegangen?"
|
||||
type: choice
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- { key: very_good, label: "Sehr gut – Probleme wurden schnell, fair und lösungsorientiert behandelt." }
|
||||
- { key: good, label: "Gut – die meisten Anliegen wurden ernst genommen und bearbeitet." }
|
||||
- { key: mixed, label: "Teils gut/teils schlecht – manche Probleme wurden gelöst, andere nicht." }
|
||||
- { key: rather_poor, label: "Eher schlecht – es wurde wenig unternommen oder nicht auf Augenhöhe kommuniziert." }
|
||||
- { key: very_poor, label: "Sehr schlecht – Probleme wurden ignoriert oder verschlimmert." }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: felt_overwhelmed
|
||||
label: "Gab es Momente, in denen du dich überfordert gefühlt hast?"
|
||||
type: choice
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- { key: "yes", label: "Ja" }
|
||||
- { key: "no", label: "Nein" }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: overwhelmed_reason
|
||||
label: "Wenn ja, wodurch?"
|
||||
type: textarea
|
||||
show_if: { question: felt_overwhelmed, equals: "yes" }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: improvement
|
||||
title: "Verbesserung"
|
||||
questions:
|
||||
- key: wished_differently
|
||||
label: "Was hättest du dir anders oder besser gewünscht?"
|
||||
type: textarea
|
||||
|
||||
- key: would_work_again
|
||||
label: "Würdest du wieder als Reiseleitung für E&P arbeiten?"
|
||||
type: choice
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- { key: "yes", label: "Ja" }
|
||||
- { key: "no", label: "Nein" }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: would_not_work_again_reason
|
||||
label: "Wenn nein, warum nicht?"
|
||||
type: textarea
|
||||
show_if: { question: would_work_again, equals: "no" }
|
||||
|
||||
- key: other
|
||||
title: "Sonstiges"
|
||||
questions:
|
||||
- key: anything_else
|
||||
label: |-
|
||||
Du hast nun schon vieles beantwortet,
|
||||
aber nirgendwo konntest du folgende Aspekte loswerden:
|
||||
type: textarea
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user